You are currently browsing the archives for October 2009

In Similitude

  • Posted on October 31, 2009 at 7:20 AM

Willy slept on the soft, comfy couch in front of the television.  This couch is “new to us” and still smells faintly of the last owner’s dog.  But the cushions are soft, like a big warm hug.  Willy likes to be part of the action, even when he’s sick, so he took up roost on the couch for his recovery.  Alex was very active, but just sick enough not to go to school and further spread this illness that’s raging through Janesville.  Willy is Alex’s primary playmate, so to Alex this whole “being sick” thing was boring, to say the least.

Alex has a peculiar sense of routine that parallels, but doesn’t follow the literature I’ve read regarding standardized routines for children with autism.  If I devise a schedule for our day, he won’t follow it.  He certainly doesn’t derive any comfort from it.  But, at the same time, certain things are expected.  And in these things Alex can be very rigid.  For example, it took me six months of low-pressure modification to get Alex to accept that the same foot doesn’t have to be first when putting his shoes on each and every time.  Now, he’ll hand me whichever foot is closest first; whereas before, if I put the wrong shoe on first, he’d take it off until the other was on.

One of Alex’s daily expectations is the merry dance between activities he and Willy shares.  They are both active little boys who are often like ships passing in the night—they do not directly engage (as part of this routine), but their play parallels each other in a way that Alex expects and enjoys.  With Willy lying on the couch, this expectation was undone.

Alex also engages with Willy directly at intervals throughout the day.  His usual ways of engaging with others tends to be a bit invasive.  Alex will get right up in someone’s face and put his hands on their mouth or grab at their arms to keep that a very direct form of contact for several minutes at a time.  He engages with Willy in this manner throughout the day.  Willy tolerates this behavior most of the time—except when it interferes with playing his game or watching television.  But when Willy was sick with the flu, he had very little tolerance for Alex’s direct engagement strategies and wasn’t up and playing around.

Alex, in turn, couldn’t tolerate this change in his routine.  He tried many things to make Willy behave normally.  He grabbed his face.  He tried to pull him up.  He bounced on him.  He laid on him.  He grabbed and pinched his arms.  And he hollered at him in a loud, squeaky tone that seemed to imitate the squirrels that like to sit on our fence and scold the stray cats as they pass through our yard.

We intervened as best we could and tried to explain to Alex that Willy was sick and needed his rest.  Alex wasn’t buying it.  He persistently and insistently tried to force Willy to behave normally.

While Alex’s expectations were developed over time, each time a child is born that child is born into expectations.  These expectations vary depending on the individual sources of these expectations.  Yet it is seemingly universal that a child born will face some set of expectations, and it is relatively rare for a child to meet them all.  Some goals that are set may be reached, but others are aborted as the child asserts a will of his or her own.  Parents are full of such expectations and each parent reacts to the child’s failure to live up to expectations differently.

This pattern of expectations, actions, and reactions can be observed with every child I’ve ever known.  A child can be neurotypical or neurologically diverse, able-bodied or physically disabled, intelligent or less intelligent, or have any other trait imaginable.  The child will be faced with unreasonable expectations, born of a parent’s desire for the child to reflect something about the parent.   The parent will, in turn, discover that the child has a will and a personhood separate from the parent.  Often, this behavior and these discoveries happen on a level below conscious thought.  Most of us are not so self-aware that we see our behavior in these terms.  Yet, it happens.  Again and again, it happens.

Like Alex, the people in our lives have expectations.  Like Willy, we are not always willing or able to live up to them.  Like Alex, many of us try to do something to ensure our expectations are met.  Like my husband and I, observers can often see how unreasonable and counterproductive these actions are.

In reading the works of autistic adults, sometimes I get the impression that this form of parental mistreatment and abuse happens especially or even only to people with neurological differences.  This is not true.  One thing that sets neurologically divergent people apart is how this sort of behavior is institutionalized and condoned in our culture and in many other cultures.

Societies, too, have expectations for their members.  People who are significantly different—whether those differences are mental, emotional, psychological, or physical—face a great deal of pressure to conform to those expectations.  Parents who reinforce those expectations are encouraged; those of us who try to change and adjust those expectations to a set that is more inclusive and less judgmental are discouraged.

Like the behaviors Alex chose to inflict on his sick brother, our attempts to force others to meet our expectations are fundamentally flawed.  They are also natural and widespread.  From the parent who tries to force their child to pursue a career-track the child either dislikes or is unsuited for, to the parent who tries to force their child to behave “normally,” from the government that tries to force its citizens into other-defined habits, to the government that tries to force all its children to learn in a standardized manner, there is the assumption that our expectations are right and that we have a right to enforce them.  The harm is real and it, too, is widespread.  But like Alex, our behaviors are often persistent and insistent and so many of us consistently fail to understand the harm we do.  Sadly, this thing we all have in common is a thing which hurts us all.

Highlight It

Response to HuffPo

  • Posted on October 30, 2009 at 8:22 AM

Perhaps it’s just that I am politically conservative…  Which means that I believe the government should practice fiscal responsibility, that our troops deserve our emotional as well as fiscal support, that freedom of religion does not mean freedom from religion, and that abortion is murder—which is to say I’m conservative not Republican.

Perhaps it’s just that I am politically conservative, but I rarely read the Huffington Post.  This particular periodical seems outrageously biased and logically lax to me.  Imagine how surprised I was when I found an opinion piece advocating neurodiversity published in the Huffington Post!  Perhaps my surprise has nothing to do with my political leanings and everything to do with the consistent ravings about the vaccine-autism link seen at HuffPo.  I just didn’t think these two positions could fit together in the same paper.

Over all, I’d have to say I support what Anthony Collins has to say in this piece:

  • He applies neurodiversity to a broad sub-set of human characteristics.
  • He acknowledges that neurodiversity is beneficial to people with severe disabilities.
  • He highlights examples of prejudice that can’t hold up to scrutiny but are rarely scrutinized.
  • He highlights the place that language has in shaping our culture and the way we interact.
  • He highlights the power and importance of genuine acceptance and equality.
  • He points out flaws with our medicinal-solution strategies.
  • He addresses the inadequacies of governmental responses to inequalities.

So, why does the piece turn me off?  It could be this description of the author:  “While managing the newspaper at a Florida university, Anthony was a major proponent for Barack Obama’s election campaign, stem cell research, right-to-die laws, ethical euthanasia, medical marijuana and self-autonomy.”  (Self-autonomy is the only one of those causes I can agree with.)  But that’s probably not it, since I didn’t read that until later.

No, it’s not what he said, but how he said it that bothers me.  I try to stay away from the more caustic tones in my writing.  Even as a fellow supporter of neurodiversity I found Anthony Collins’ tone a bit grating.  Then again, I tend to write essays, otherwise known as literary nonfiction, not opinion pieces.  According to Susan Shapiro’s article in Writer’s Digest, an opinion piece is the supposed to be very opinionated—or, to put it another way, to get published one should “avoid being mild-mannered, tactful or diplomatic.”  So, this tone was definitely publishable.  But is that caustic, grating tone really beneficial?

If you’re goal is to get published, then I suppose so.  If your goal is to be persuasive, then I suspect not.  Most people are swayed by a mix of emotional and logical triggers—alienation is not one of these triggers and the caustic, grating tone often alienates readers, even while it entertains them.

You can get others who already agree with you riled up by grating on raw nerves, but anyone sitting on the fence is either going to stay on the fence—or worse, they’re going to turn away because the behavior is too untoward for them to want to associate themselves with or too offensive to generate empathy and support.

Perhaps a HuffPo reader wouldn’t find this piece so grating.  Perhaps they’re so used to this grating tone it slides right off of them.  They’re almost certainly amused and entertained by the tone, which is why they’re HuffPo readers.  But, that doesn’t mean they’re convinced or will even seriously consider the topic passed the last paragraph.  Effective communication requires so much more than just hot words shot off in quick, biting fashion.

Highlight It

“How do you do it?”

  • Posted on October 27, 2009 at 12:00 PM

I’m asked this question a lot, usually after I express a combination of the following:

  • I am the mother of three children with autism.
  • I am college student pursuing my Bachelor’s degree.
  • I am establishing my professional writing career.
  • I am in the pre-startup phase of launching a copywriting business.

The question seems like the inevitable consequence of relating this information:  “How do you do it?”  Yet, as inevitable as this question apparently is, I don’t really understand it.  What am I doing that’s so spectacular/impressive/noteworthy?  What am I doing that elicits this response?

The short answer, which I can give without any clarification, is:  “I do what I have to.”

A more expansive response would relate any or all of the following:

  • I have acknowledged and accepted the fact that my life is “different.”
  • I have gone to great lengths, using a variety of strategies, to formulate a planned approach that satisfies a variety of needs simultaneously.
  • I have a very supportive husband and mother who are constantly cheering for me and facilitate the attainment of my goals through personal sacrifice.
  • I have a variety of supportive friends and family who, while less constant, are cheering for me and facilitate the attainment of my goals.
  • My own neurologically is conducive to a strange mix of focus and distractibility that makes multi-tasking work for me in a way that, so I’m told, would drive others crazy.
  • By raising my children and pursuing my dreams, I’m doing what I love and (hopefully) teaching my children to do the same.
  • I’m really, really motivated to both be there for my family and financially support my family, which leads back to me just doing what I have to do.

Is this answer adequate?  If not, how can I answer it further?

Highlight It

Swine Flu & Media Bias

  • Posted on October 26, 2009 at 3:36 AM

I haven’t been online much.  More accurately, my time online has centered on getting my finals done over the last few days.  I’ll be back in action this week!

But now I need to rant.  My son, Ben, may or may not have swine flu.  However his symptoms may parallel the e-mail that’s been circulating around, however his symptoms may incite worries of swine flu from a particularly qualified family member with medical training, the fact is his symptoms don’t make it swine flu.  The particular virus—which would have to be tested and identified by a microbiologist or similarly qualified individual with a sample of my son’s blood—makes it swine flu.  Not every sore throat is strep, not every nasty little flu bug going around in swine flu.

For most of my adult life, I’ve heard the news media scream and rave about the coming epidemic.  I remember when HIV was going to leave us with death camps that left infected people cordoned off in their own area away from “clean” people.  This wasn’t a science fiction doomsday scenario or posted on a conspiracy theorists’ blog.  I read this theory in a newspaper.

In grade school, in junior high, and in high school I remember journalism being described as an unbiased medium for informing our democratic nation.  Hooey!  Whoever said that either had an agenda or never read the guidelines for some of our top newspapers.  Unbiased?  Hardly!  They call it slant, but a slant is a bias – and slants/biases are required for publication.  News anchors face a similar fate.

So, once it was HIV – the great and terrible epidemic.  A few years ago it was avian flu.  I know there were some others between, but they left such an indelible impression that I cannot, for the life of me, recall their names.  Last year the new “devastating epidemic” was swine flu and it’s still raging, coursing through the papers more rapidly than its coursing through our nation.

What all these incidents have in common is two-fold:  First, the dangers of the virus are real.  Secondly, the news media overstates and exaggerates these real dangers for effect.

The effect they’re looking for is called “market share” which leads to revenues.  The more people watch or read the news, particularly their newspaper or television station, the more they can demand in ad revenues.  News media is a business.  Because news media is a business, the news that is reported is biased by the need for the news to “sell.”  Sensational news sells.  Mundane news doesn’t.  Stories sell.  Dry facts don’t.  Death tolls sell.  Recovery rates don’t.  Panic sells.  Common sense doesn’t.  This creates a very real and very bad bias in news reporting.

Perhaps my family faces swine flu.  Perhaps not.  The facts are that Ben is sick.  He’s been sick for days.  He’s fever goes up and it goes down.  He’s not drinking enough and is barely eating.  He’s coughing.  He needs prayers and he needs TLC.  He may need medical intervention.  Willy is sick again, too.  His seems like a different flu strain, which isn’t much of a consolation.  Alex is coughing, but not feverish.  I’m fighting it all off with a little bit of wooziness and lots of interrupted sleep.  Mark’s robust immune system seems to be staving it all off with little apparent effort.

We need your prayers.  We need real information on when and if to seek advanced medical help (good thing we have that qualified family member).  What we don’t need is panic.  We don’t need an ineffectual “national emergency.”  We certainly don’t need the news media’s biased reporting.  Swine flu is real and it’s dangerous.  It’s so much harder to protect ourselves when the news media is too busy selling its hype to report the facts.

Highlight It

“Wow!”

  • Posted on October 21, 2009 at 1:47 AM

Can I just say that again?  “Wow!”  Today has been a great day, and I just don’t get to say that enough.  It’s not that I don’t have good days or even great days.  It’s just that things get so busy the “great” just goes flying by and I don’t stop to reflect until the humdrum days come.  So, I want to take a moment out of this very busy day and just say, “Wow!”

The reason I want to write is because I cannot imagine making a living any other way and still being happy.  I’ve tried various jobs and experienced various degrees of unhappiness doing those jobs.  I love to write, and as long as I believe what I’m writing, I’ll write just about anything.  Getting paid for it is just one of those bonuses that life throws at me every now and then.

The reason why I write about neurodiversity is different.  Blogging, of course, is cool, because you get to interact with people spread across the world in dialogues you’d not likely have in any other way.  But writing for publication goes beyond even this.  I’m working on a piece about The Autism Acceptance Project.  E-mailing back and forth with Estee is always great.  I’ve enjoyed her work for years and this project (mine, not TAAP), started expressly because of that friendship and my admiration for her work.  Busy as she is, I’m pretty sure I could e-mail her just to say “Hi.”

Today, I had an opportunity I probably wouldn’t have attempted without this project.  I got to call and speak with Michael Moon!  And I have to say it again:  “Wow!”  Of course I’ve spoken with autistic adults before (I can’t imagine having a child diagnosed with autism and not seeking out autistic adults for their insight, though I know it happens), and I always have to shake myself afterwards and try to understand where the prejudice comes from.   But, wow, is Michael an impressive person!

His photography is inspiring, his music is tingling (in a very good way), and his words are powerful.  Get a taste of his work and know that is his time to devote to the site hasn’t quite caught up with his aspirations for its content (which means there’s more to come).  But the content is rich and moving as it is, so check it out!

Busy or not, I couldn’t let this “great” fly by without one last “Wow!”

Highlight It

On Writing

  • Posted on October 17, 2009 at 12:44 PM

I have wanted to write since I was ten years old.  My first love is for stories – all kinds of stories.  Novels, short stories, ballads, anecdotes, movies, and television are some of the mediums I tend to gravitate towards.  I have written one novel (it’s in a box) and have another pinned to my wall.  I’ve written and published short stories, but my success in fiction has been less than mediocre.

I knew I wanted to write for a living and pursued a few different strategies to do that.  The latest is business writing, which should result in a viable small business by this time next year.

Writing non-fiction didn’t really interest me until recently.  It was a practical avenue to break into business writing, but other than blogging I didn’t see the non-fiction venues as my thing.  While I intended to write a book about autism someday, trying to share a different perspective than the books I’d read when my kids were first diagnosed, I didn’t really take it seriously as a professional pursuit.

I don’t know about other people, but I tend to get flashes of insight.  I see my interests and activities align in an unexpected way.  Writing, professionalism, neurodiversity, and the need for more mainstream attention to this important perspective was an unexpected alignment for me.  The quality, quantity, and marketability of my writing have gone up significantly since this alignment became apparent to me.  After over a decade of trying to write professionally, I sit down and write about a topic I’m passionate about, and lo and behold, my work is accepted, and then another piece is accepted and published.  On it goes and I hope it continues.

I don’t expect to make a living writing about neurodiversity, but I do hope to make an impact.

For those who are interested, I now have a working writing blog up.  Its primary target is the writing group I started, but the material on there is useful for almost anyone who’s interested in writing.  If you want tips on how to break into publication, just ask and I’ll tell you what I can.

Highlight It

Neurodiversity is for Everyone

  • Posted on October 12, 2009 at 10:06 PM

When I learned my first son had autism I also learned the recommended “solution” to this “problem” was to institutionalize him.  Willy displayed most of the symptoms and traits of classic autism.  He’d experienced a serious, obvious regression.  He was very unhappy, confused, and frustrated; he threw tantrums for no apparent reason.  Alex was two.  He had no words and didn’t want to play with or even acknowledge the existence of other children.  The doctors suggested that Alex’s behavior was in response to Willy’s behavior.  The doctors told us many things.  What they didn’t tell us was how we could help our children.

I never considered the possibility of consigning my son to an institution.  Children, no matter how challenged or challenging, are not disposable.  I was full of feelings that I could not put into words.  The closest I could come was:  “You can’t have my son!”  Later, those words developed into:  “My children aren’t broken, don’t try to fix them.”  On the Internet, I began to hear “whispers” of another approach.  Apparently, there was another way to look at these “problems.”  These “whispers” came from people who did not support the idea of neurodiversity and did not state the concept itself.  These people, when given the opportunity, told me my feelings were wrong and I was harming my child by not trying every treatment available, or at least the treatment they supported as the “miracle cure.”

I was a political blogger at that time, devoted to the anti-incumbent sentiment.  In short, I was already something of a rebel – ready and willing to challenge the status quo.  I was quirky, neurotic, and intelligent.  I struggled with social relationships and face-to-face meetings; and I already knew I had traits occupational therapists described as Sensory Integration Disorder.  I already knew that the best thing for me was to learn how to cope and for others to let me just be myself.  Why, oh why, could my boys not get the same respect I wanted for myself!?!

Sure, I was teased mercilessly as a child.  Sure, there were lots and lots of people who tried to marginalize me, and some even succeeded.  But it’s my head.  It’s my mind.  Why should anyone get to mess with that?  My husband, too, is neurologically different.  With bi-polar disorder, he’s faced a lot of outward pressure to conform to something he is not; and all that pressure seems to do is to make it more and more difficult for him to function.  Why should anyone get to change him?  Why can’t they just help him?  And, now, our children, who are so different they need the label “autism” to make them understandable – a label full of fear and shame and voices calling for their imprisonment.  Why should anyone get to mess with my kids’ minds?  Why should anyone get to say they are anything less than children?

All these feelings were denied, put down, and explained away.  I was wrong.  I was simply wrong.  The psychologists were right.  I was wrong, and if I were fixed I would know I was wrong.  If you’ve read this far, then I suspect you know how that feels.  It’s not good.  What was worse for me was how my words were twisted and distorted from what I meant.  I ask for help and people talk cure.  Words are my tools, as a writer, they’re my strength.  But all my words were being shot back at me, deformed and malign.

In the blogging venue, I stumbled on Estee’s The Joy of Adam (the old one) and somehow I got to Zilari’s Processing in Parts (the blog is now gone and I miss her).  There my feelings were validated.  Even when we didn’t agree, they didn’t say I was wrong for feeling the way I did.  And, they gave me a word:  neurodiversity.  I love words.  I collect words.  I understand words, with all their limitations and capacity for misstatement, I understand them.  That word was quite possibly the greatest gift any “community” has ever given me.  I could take all the pain, all the rejection, all the hurtful things, and I could dump them into that word.  And I did.  Suddenly, I was talking to people who didn’t shoot back cure when I said help, and it felt wonderful.

But, neurodiversity is more than that.  Neurodiversity isn’t for any one type or group.  Neurodiversity is for everyone.  Neurodiversity is for Willy who is doing so well by societies standards despite with his autism.  Neurodiversity is for Alex who still struggles so very much.  Neurodiversity is for Ben who is his own little man.  Neurodiversity is for Mark, who needs acceptance and accommodation because society sees him as a failure, and so he sees himself.  Neurodiversity is for me, though my differences aren’t “disabling,” I’m still too different to succeed without the acknowledgement that being different is okay.  And neurodiversity is for my neurotypical step-son, who has unique learning needs of his own, though he can get by in the status-quo society we live in.

To me, neurodiversity is about questioning what we know and what we think we know about how people think.  It’s about discarding prejudices and assumptions about the existence of a “proper” or “appropriate” way to think.  It’s about questioning the use of “normal” or “abnormal” to describe anyone’s thinking.  To me, neurodiversity is about recognizing and appreciating that everyone has a “different” mind, one that is unique to them, and that nobody should be marginalized, disenfranchised, or violated because their mind doesn’t meet somebody else’s standards or expectations.

Freedom of thought is a fundamental right that nobody has the authority to take away.  We can regulate and legislate against people’s actions.  We can regulate and legislate against people’s words.  We cannot regulate or legislate against people’s thoughts.  Thoughts are our own.  You don’t know someone else’s thoughts.  You do not understand someone else’s mind.  You can also perceive what goes on in someone else’s mind through their behavior.  And your observation depends on what the other person communicates and what filters you put on that communication.

To deem someone’s thoughts or feelings as right or wrong is the ultimate act of hubris.  To invade someone’s thoughts or feelings is the ultimate form of rape.  To re-write someone’s thoughts or feelings to suit your own purposes is the ultimate form of murder.

Behaviors and communications are regulated and society chooses which to legislate against.  We form rules, both legal and social, to shape what we consider appropriate.  This is not going to change.  What we can change is the limits and assumptions we place on those behaviors and communications.  Being different and expressing oneself differently shouldn’t be against the rules.

Self-expression is a fundamental right secondary only to freedom of thought.  There is one primary reason I know of to regulate or legislate against self-expression and that is immediate or imminent harm.  The proverbial “fire” in the crowded building.  The cliché “I’m going to kill you.”  A picture of someone with a bullet through their head left in someone’s mailbox.  A picture of a naked child in a suggestive position.  These are threatening, harmful forms of self-expression.  They either cause harm or suggest harm will be caused.  A secondary reason to regulate or legislate against self-expression is those messages that manipulate for the purpose of or with the result of doing harm.  Pornography, false advertising, perjury, and defamation fall under this category.

Silencing the dissenting voice because it doesn’t fit with others’ expectations should not ever be regulated or legislated against – not legally and not socially.  Nobody should dictate how someone must communicate.  Nobody should dictate what someone should communicate on their own behalf.  Nobody should dictate when someone can communicate.  Nobody should dictate why someone should communicate.  Nobody should dictate if someone should be allowed to communicate.  Anybody who does these things on behalf of neurodiversity, in my opinion, is distorting, deforming, and maligning the meaning of the word.

Neurodiversity is about recognizing and celebrating the individual in whatever shape, form, color, creed, brain, or label they come in.  Anything less is not “diversity.”  It’s certainly not neurodiversity.

***This post is inspired by the conversations taking place on The Standard Review, but the thoughts are my own.  I do not assume to fully understand or in any way express the thoughts, values, or beliefs Ed has expressed.  But I certainly do respect and appreciate them.***

Highlight It

My Family

  • Posted on October 12, 2009 at 6:54 PM

Adelaide left the following comment:

I think you paint a true picture of Alex (and his brothers) through your words. And a moving picture would be terrific.

I realize now that she was talking about how in my essay I describe most pictures of Alex being ones with Alex in motion.  I thought she was talking about me posting pictures or a video feed, i.e. if I posted a moving picture that would be terrific.  Sometimes I think in very literal terms without considering context.

Now, I realize she didn’t mean that, but I’d already decided some pictures of the boys would be a good idea.

So, here’s my family:

Picture of Family Picture

Picture of Family PictureBen's close-upBen's close-upBen's close-up

 

Willy on YouTube

Willy on YouTube

 

Willy on his jumping break

Willy on his jumping break

 

Alex on the Couch

Alex on the CouchBen's close-up

Alex likes close ups, too!

Alex likes close ups, too!

 
 

Mark, my husband

Mark, my husband

Daddy & Ben

Daddy & BenBen's close-upBen's close-up

Ben's close-up

Ben's close-up

 

Highlight It

Discovering SID

  • Posted on October 10, 2009 at 12:00 PM

The Occupational Therapist for the Birth to Three program balanced a little, two-and-a-half-year old Willy on a giant, red ball.  The Speech and Language Pathologist tried in vain to get the toothbrush in Willy’s mouth.  I sat back, absorbing their various strategies and tactics, trying to determine how to use what I was learning at home.

“He’s not going to open,” the speech therapist said.

“Can you really blame him,” I asked, a little bemused.  “Brushing your teeth hurts, and it’s not like he understands how important it is so that he’ll do it anyway.”

They looked at me.  I blushed, feeling like I said something wrong.  Was a parent not supposed to admit that brushing one’s teeth hurt in front of a child?

Then, the OT said the words that changed everything.  “It’s not supposed to hurt.”

Startled, I jerked a little.  “Of course it hurts.”

“Are you talking about cavities,” the speech therapist asked.

“No.  Well, yes, that hurts, too.  But I’m talking about the gums.  Brushing your teeth hurts the gums.”

Their heads tilted in different directions.

“Maybe you’re brushing too hard,” the speech therapist said.

The OT shook her head.  “SID,” she said, a little sad and a little curious.

I felt the muscle in my forehead scrunch tight.  “Brushing your teeth doesn’t hurt?”

They shook their heads.  My tense muscles suddenly deflated, bringing posture to my attention.  My torso was all squishy again.

“Okay, so what’s SID?”

When my little boy was born I couldn’t have imagined that through him, and his brothers, I would learn how to regulate my own body.  It never occurred to me that brushing one’s teeth wasn’t supposed to hurt or certain products could reduce the discomfort.  It never occurred to me that other people couldn’t feel individual strands of hair shifted by the “breeze” created by a door opening and shutting behind them.  It never occurred to me that the sound a fire alarm makes doesn’t shatter other peoples’ thoughts; no, my panic was always attributed (by me and others) to our house burning down when I was little.  I didn’t have low muscle tone as a child; I was weak, scrawny, and had bad posture.  Hundreds of little differences, and I would never have known but for my children.

Highlight It

“But it’s Goldfish!”

  • Posted on October 8, 2009 at 12:00 PM

Mornings are usually a pretty hectic time.  Usually I have three kids to get ready for school on little (or no) sleep because I stay up late to do my school work.  Ben is also a night-time guy.  He doesn’t like mornings and this transition from a half-day of school in the afternoon to a full-day of school that starts with 7:30 a.m. bus ride has been a struggle.  I had to send a box of CoCo Puffs to school, because he wasn’t eating any breakfast before being carried to the bus.

So, on a bleary-eyed Tuesday morning I prepped Ben’s bowl of CoCo Puffs hoping to coax a few bites into him before sending him on his way.  When I stumbled back into the living room, he was munching from Alex’s bowl of Goldfish crackers, which Alex got himself.  I handed Ben the bowl of CoCo Puffs.  He took it, looking down rather sadly.  He looked up at me with his big, green eyes wide awake and a little pout curling down the corners of his lips.  “Buh is Golfiss,” he said sadly.

This whole thing where Ben strings words together to make complete sentences is a very new and rather sporadic skill, so I was caught off guard.  Had he climbed on the couch to thump me in the forehead I would have been less surprised.  So, I immediately turned around and went back to the kitchen and fetched another bowl, this time dropping Goldfish in to make a nice, orange pile.  I took the bowl to Ben, not expecting much in way of thanks.

His eyes lit up and he said, “Is Golfiss, is Goldfiss!”  And he munched happily away from both bowls until the bus came.  He skipped out to the bus with a big, happy grin for the first morning since school started.

When the kids were away and I could finally crawl back under the warm covers, I couldn’t help but smile.

Highlight It